Что думаешь? Оцени!
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.。夫子对此有专业解读
前款规定的淫秽物品或者淫秽信息中涉及未成年人的，从重处罚。。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said: "The days of tech firms having a free pass are over... no woman should have to chase platform after platform, waiting days for an image to come down".